Lawyer for Article 212 Criminal Code of Ukraine: Defense in Tax Evasion Cases

Article 212 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine provides liability for evasion from payment of taxes, fees and other mandatory payments. This is one of the most common crime compositions in economic activity sphere that threatens not only significant fines but also imprisonment. Professional lawyer defense in such cases is critically important for preserving business, freedom and reputation.

What is Article 212 Criminal Code of Ukraine: Crime Composition

Article 212 of Criminal Code of Ukraine establishes criminal liability for evasion from payment of taxes, fees and other mandatory payments. Crime is considered committed when taxpayer intentionally, through submission of knowingly false data or concealment of taxation objects, evades from payment of legally established payments.

Objective side of crime consists in submission of knowingly false tax reporting, concealment of income or taxation objects, unlawful reduction of tax obligation or use of fictitious documents for obtaining tax benefits.

Subjective side is characterized by direct intent – person realizes unlawfulness of actions and desires to evade from tax payment. Proving intent often becomes key moment in case, as technical accounting errors are not crime in absence of intent.

Qualification Signs: Significant, Large and Especially Large Sizes

Legislator differentiates liability depending on unpaid tax size:

Part 1 Art. 212 CC – evasion in significant sizes (from 3000 to 7500 non-taxable minimum incomes, i.e. from 51,000 to 127,500 hryvnias). Punishment: fine from 3000 to 5000 non-taxable minimums or freedom restriction up to three years with deprivation of right to hold certain positions.

Part 2 Art. 212 CC – evasion in large sizes (from 7500 to 15000 non-taxable minimums, i.e. from 127,500 to 255,000 hryvnias). Punishment: fine from 5000 to 7000 non-taxable minimums or freedom restriction up to five years, or imprisonment for same term.

Part 3 Art. 212 CC – evasion in especially large sizes (over 15000 non-taxable minimums, i.e. over 255,000 hryvnias). Punishment: fine from 10000 to 15000 non-taxable minimums or imprisonment from five to ten years.

How Lawyer Defends During Tax Evasion Suspicion

Professional defense in Art. 212 CC Ukraine cases provides comprehensive approach at all criminal proceedings stages.

At pre-trial investigation stage lawyer:

Detailedly analyzes tax audit documents – audit acts, notice-decisions, expert conclusions. Often precisely at this stage procedural violations or calculation errors are detected.

Collects evidence for accusation refutation – forms alternative evidence base: primary documents, contracts, payment orders, bank statements confirming client action lawfulness.

Engages independent experts for conducting tax and accounting examinations that can refute state expert conclusions.

Objects to investigator procedural actions, submits petitions for evidence inadmissibility recognition, appeals resolutions on examination appointment, searches, property arrests.

At trial stage, lawyer builds defense on proving intent absence, tax authority calculation errors presence or action qualification as administrative offense, not crime.

Criminal Liability Release Possibilities

Legislation provides several criminal punishment avoidance mechanisms even with evasion fact establishment.

Note to Article 212 CC Ukraine establishes special ground: person who first committed act is released from criminal liability if paid taxes, fees and compensated state damage (financial sanctions, penalty) before criminal liability attraction.

Important conditions: crime committed first time (no criminal record), full tax debt payment before suspicion notice, all financial sanctions and penalty payment.

Also possible is release application through active repentance (Art. 45 CC Ukraine) or act insignificance (Art. 11-1 CC Ukraine), when act formally contains crime signs but doesn’t represent great public danger.

Typical Taxpayer Mistakes

Many entrepreneurs face criminal prosecution not due to intentional evasion but due to insufficient understanding of tax legislation complexity. Most common mistakes:

• Incorrect transaction documentary execution – primary document absence, invoice discrepancies
• Working with shell company counterparties for tax credit obtaining
• Tax base understatement through income portion non-reflection
• Tax benefit abuse without proper grounds
• Tax planning absence during business restructuring

Knowledge of these typical mistakes and timely lawyer consultation help avoid them.

Lawyer’s Role in Tax Authority Decision Appeals

Successful defense often begins not in court but at tax authority decision administrative appeal stage. Timely appeal can prevent criminal proceedings emergence.

Tax authority notice-decision can be appealed administratively or judicially within 10 days. Lawyer analyzes audit procedural violations, appeals calculation methodology, proves operation reality and uses positive judicial practice.

Successful appeal not only reduces or cancels tax debt but also significantly weakens prosecution positions in criminal proceedings.

Judicial Practice: What Defense Arguments Work

Supreme Court and appellate court decision analysis allows identifying most effective defense arguments in tax evasion cases.

Direct intent absence – courts repeatedly recognized that technical accounting errors, legislation interpretation discrepancies or accountant good faith error cannot be qualified as crime in absence of proven taxpayer evasion intent. Intent proof burden lies on prosecution side.

Tax audit procedure violation – numerous cases were closed due to evidence inadmissibility recognition obtained during audits conducted with Tax Code of Ukraine violations. Audit order non-service, deadline exceeding, necessary permission absence become appeal grounds.

Expert conclusion errors – tax examinations often contain methodological errors, obsolete standard use, real economic activity circumstance non-consideration. Repeat or commission examination appointment often refutes primary conclusions and destroys prosecution evidence base.

Accountant and Director Liability: Who Answers for Evasion

In tax case practice often arises question of liability differentiation between enterprise director and chief accountant. By general rule, Art. 212 CC crime subject is person upon whom tax calculation and payment obligation is assigned – usually director.

However, for criminal liability attraction necessary to prove specific person’s personal intent. If director lacked special taxation knowledge and relied on accountant professionalism, and errors made by accountant without director knowledge – this may be weighty defense ground.

Lawyer in such cases collects evidence confirming: company obligation distribution (orders, job descriptions), director control absence over specific accounting operations, reliance on accountant professionalism, personal evasion benefit absence. Meanwhile accountant may bear liability if personal crime commission intent proven.

What to Do Upon Tax Audit Notice Receipt

Tax audit notice receipt often becomes first signal about possible problems that may lead to criminal proceedings. Correct actions at this stage can prevent serious consequences.

First of all, shouldn’t ignore notice or obstruct audit – this only worsens situation and creates additional grounds for information concealment suspicion. Instead, necessary to immediately contact lawyer specializing in tax cases.

Before audit beginning, lawyer helps: verify audit appointment legality (grounds presence, procedure compliance), prepare all necessary documents and eliminate obvious accounting deficiencies, instruct employees about their rights and obligations during audit, develop auditor interaction strategy.

During audit conduct, lawyer controls tax authority procedural requirement compliance, records possible auditor violations, participates in act and protocol compilation, provides written objections to detected violations. Important to remember that taxpayer has right to give explanations on each fact recorded in audit act and provide additional defense documents.

After audit completion, if tax assessment notice-decision issued, lawyer evaluates appeal prospects and prepares corresponding documents. Timely and competent appeal at administrative or judicial level can completely stop case development into criminal plane.

Why Choose Dextra Law

Dextra Law legal company has deep expertise in tax evasion case conduct. Our lawyers combine criminal process knowledge with tax legislation intricacy understanding.

Our advantages:

• Experience in complex tax cases with million hryvnia accusations
• Comprehensive approach – from tax decision appeals to court defense
• Leading tax consultant, auditor, accountant engagement
• Individual strategy considering client business specifics
• 98% of court cases end in clients’ favor

If you were notified about Art. 212 CC Ukraine suspicion or tax audit with criminal prosecution signs is conducted – contact Dextra Law for professional defense of your rights and business.

Frequently Asked Questions